Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
M. nemestrina immunized with an apathogenic HIV-2 molecular clone (HIV-2KR) were protected from CD4 decline and disease upon challenge with HIV-2(287), after any immunizing virus could be detected. Higher but not lower inocula of HIV-2KR were protective against intravenous inoculation of either 10(5) or 10(1) TCID50 of HIV-2(287). Protected animals displayed substantial reductions in PBMC proviral burden (1-3 logs), viral titers (1-2 logs), and plasma viral RNA (2-4 logs) compared to unprotected or naive animals as early as 1 week postinfection. Plasma viral RNA became undetectable after 24 weeks in protected animals, but remained high in unprotected animals. No viral RNA was present in the spleen of the protected animal necropsied more than a year after challenge (though viral DNA was still present). No neutralizing responses could be demonstrated, but CTL activity was detected sooner and at higher levels after challenge in protected than in unprotected macaques. In this novel HIV-2 vaccine model, protection was clearly dose-dependent, and clearance of challenge virus RNA from the plasma did not require detectable ongoing replication of the immunizing virus at the time of challenge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Looney et al. (1998) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: