Key result
Zoledronic acid and low bone mass show no association with circulating periostin levels in postmenopausal women.
Why the study?
Does zoledronic acid treatment affect circulating periostin levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass, and do levels differ from those with normal bone mass?
Observational (n=76)
Does zoledronic acid treatment affect circulating periostin levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass, and do levels differ from those with normal bone mass?
Absolute Event Rate: 272% vs 250%
p-value: p=0.279
Serum periostin levels do not appear to be a useful biomarker for differentiating low from normal bone mass in postmenopausal women, nor do they reflect the short-term effects of zoledronic acid treatment.
Periostin levels lack utility as a biomarker for bone mass or zoledronic acid effects in postmenopausal women; leaves open its role in osteoporosis research.
Periostin is a secreted extracellular matrix protein preferentially expressed in bone by osteocytes and periosteal osteoblasts. Reduced periostin expression may affect osteoblast differentiation and collagen type I synthesis and predispose to osteoporosis and increased fracture risk. We aimed to evaluate circulating periostin levels in postmenopausal women with low bone mass, their possible correlations with clinical and laboratory parameters, as well as the 3-month effect of zoledronic acid. Serum samples for periostin, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, parathyroid hormone (PTH), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTx), and total alkaline phosphatase (tALP) were obtained from 46 postmenopausal women with low bone mass at baseline and 3 months after zoledronic acid infusion and from 30 age-matched, postmenopausal controls with normal bone mass at baseline. There was no difference in periostin levels between women with normal and low bone mass (250±15 vs. 272±14 ng/ml, respectively; p=0.279). Periostin remained essentially unchanged after zoledronic acid infusion (262±18 ng/ml; p=0.130). Serum periostin levels at baseline were not affected by previous bisphosphonate treatment, and were correlated only to tALP (rs=0.351; p=0.018). In multiple linear regression analysis, tALP (B=3.17; 95% CI=0.59-5.79; p=0.018) was associated with serum periostin levels at baseline, independently from previous anti-osteoporotic treatment, age, body mass index, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. In conclusion, serum periostin levels do not differ between postmenopausal women with normal and low bone mass and are not affected by zoledronic acid treatment. Women with higher tALP have independently higher periostin levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anastasilakis et al. (2013) conducted an observational in Low bone mass (n=76). Low bone mass vs. Normal bone mass was evaluated on Circulating periostin levels (p=0.279). Circulating periostin levels did not differ between postmenopausal women with low versus normal bone mass (272±14 vs 250±15 ng/ml; p=0.279) and were not affected by zoledronic acid treatment.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: