Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Although predictive maintenance (PdM) is widely recognized for its strategic value, its adoption remains uneven across the manufacturing sector, particularly among manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). These firms face persistent barriers to adoption, from unclear ROI to legacy-system integration and cybersecurity constraints. This research develops and exploratorily assesses an OEM-end-user collaborative PdM ecosystem using a Design Science Research methodology. The artifact is grounded in a systematic review of 123 studies spanning adoption barriers, contribution frameworks, and adjacent maintenance. The study’s contribution lies not in a new PdM algorithm, but in integrating five elements usually treated separately socio-technical framing, a configurable reference architecture, a progressive roadmap, a trust-by-design pack and OEM-end-user value exchange into a single ecosystem, with AI positioned as an an enabler, not a prescription. The proposed artifact was assessed through three rounds of modular expert surveys with non-overlapping participants. Findings confirm PdM adoption as fundamentally a socio-technical challenge rather than a technical one, with experts endorsing progressive deployment, human-in-the-loop oversight, efficient data use, and governed OEM-end-user collaboration as the conditions that make adoption work. This study offers an evidence-informed, expert assessed blueprint bridging PdM technical maturity and industrial adoption, laying the groundwork for future field evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
benhanifia et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: