Key result
Automated ultrasound image processing shows good agreement with reference RF echo-tracking for measuring carotid IMT.
Why the study?
Does a newly developed automatic system for assessing carotid stiffness and IMT from ultrasound images provide comparable measurements to a reference RF echo-tracking system in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and healthy volunteers?
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Does a newly developed automatic system for assessing carotid stiffness and IMT from ultrasound images provide comparable measurements to a reference RF echo-tracking system in patients with cardiovascular risk factors and healthy volunteers?
An automated system based on standard ultrasound image processing provides comparable measurements of carotid intima-media thickness and arterial stiffness to a reference RF echo-tracking system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports automated carotid IMT assessment from standard ultrasound; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
OBJECTIVE: Increased arterial stiffness and carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) are considered independent predictors of cardiovascular events. The aim of this study was to compare a system recently developed in our laboratory for automatic assessment of these parameters from ultrasound image sequences to a reference radio frequency (RF) echo-tracking system. METHODS: Common carotid artery scans of 21 patients with cardiovascular risk factors and 12 healthy volunteers were analyzed by both devices for the assessment of diameter (D), IMT, and distension (DeltaD). In the healthy volunteers, analyses were repeated twice to evaluate intraobserver variability. Agreement was evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis, whereas reproducibility was expressed as a coefficient of variation (CV). RESULTS: Regarding the agreement between the two systems, bias values +/- SD were 0.060 +/- 0.110 mm for D, -0.006 +/- 0.039 mm for IMT, and -0.016 +/- 0.039 mm for DeltaD. Intraobserver CVs were 2% +/- 2% for D, 5% +/- 5% for IMT, and 6% +/- 6% for DeltaD with the RF echo-tracking system and 2% +/- 1% for D, 6% +/- 6% for IMT, and 8% +/- 6% for DeltaD with our automated system. CONCLUSIONS: Although B-mode-based devices are less precise than RF-based ones, our automated system has good agreement with the reference method and comparable reproducibility, at least when high-quality images are analyzed. Hence, this study suggests that the presented system based on image processing from standard ultrasound scans is a suitable device for measuring IMT and local arterial stiffness parameters in clinical studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bianchini et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular risk factors (n=33). Automated ultrasound image processing system vs. Reference radio frequency (RF) echo-tracking system was evaluated on Agreement (bias) between systems for diameter, intima-media thickness, and distension. An automated ultrasound image processing system showed good agreement with a reference radio frequency echo-tracking system for measuring carotid intima-media thickness (bias -0.006 +/- 0.039 mm).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: