Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Seven laboratory‐scale experiments were carried out to study the effects of cellulases/hemicellulases on silage fermentation of herbage from mixed swards of timothy (Phleum pratense), meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) and red clover (Trifolium pretense). Enzyme‐treated silage (approximately 3500 HEC units kg−1 grass) reached a low pH sooner, had lower end pH, contained less NH3‐N and more lactic acid than did the untreated silage (P < 0·05). Applied with an inoculant, these effects were even stronger. With easily ensiled crops (experiments 1, 2, 5 and 6) preservation was first of all improved by inoculation of lactic acid bacteria; however, for the low‐sugar crops (experiments 3, 4 and 7) enzyme treatment was more significant. The enzymes derived from Aspergillus spp. gave more acetic acid than the enzymes from Trichoderma reesei. The Trichoderma enzymes liberated 4·8 g WSC kg−1 FM gamma‐irradiated grass during 60 d at pH 4·3 (P < 0·05). On average, for all silages enzyme treatment increased the sum of residual sugar and fermentation products by 3·7 g kg−1 FM (21 g kg−1 DM) compared with the silages not treated with enzymes (P < 0·001). Enzyme treatment increased the instantly degradable part of the feed, but total in sacco and in vitro digestibilities were not affected.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
I. Selmer-Olsen (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: