Key result
Triple lipid-lowering therapy is linked to ~63% LDL-C reduction versus dual or monotherapy in CAD.
Why the study?
The study was designed to evaluate the effects of varying lipid-lowering therapy strategies on lipid profiles and insulin resistance biomarkers in patients with CAD.
Does intensified lipid-lowering therapy (dual or triple therapy) improve atherogenic and metabolic markers compared to monotherapy in patients with coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=1,391)
Does intensified lipid-lowering therapy (dual or triple therapy) improve atherogenic and metabolic markers compared to monotherapy in patients with coronary artery disease?
Triple lipid-lowering therapy with a statin, ezetimibe, and a PCSK9 inhibitor provides the most comprehensive control of atherogenic lipid markers in CAD patients compared to dual or monotherapy.
TyG trajectories were associated with lipid target attainment under LLT in CAD; leaves open whether IR modulation improves outcomes beyond lipids.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To evaluate the effects of varying lipid-lowering therapy (LLT) strategies on lipid profiles and insulin resistance (IR) biomarkers in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This prospective observational study enrolled 1391 CAD patients receiving monotherapy (statin or ezetimibe), dual therapy (statin + ezetimibe), or triple therapy (dual + PCSK9 inhibitor) at discharge. After a median 1-year follow-up, attainment rates and changes in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C), remnant cholesterol (RC), total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride-glucose (TyG) index, and atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) were assessed. Linear regression evaluated associations between LLT intensity and biomarker percent change, with subgroup and interaction analyses exploring effect modification by baseline characteristics. Triple therapy achieved the largest reductions in LDL-C (-62.9%), non-HDL-C (-57.5%), ApoB (-56.1%), RC (-45.1%), and TyG (-7.1%), followed by dual therapy. Higher LLT intensity was independently associated with greater reductions in LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TC, with triple therapy outperforming dual therapy. Greater TyG reduction with triple therapy was significant in unadjusted but not adjusted analyses. In the triple therapy group, goal attainment of LDL-C, non-HDL-C, ApoB, and RC improved significantly from baseline (all P < 0.01). BMI significantly modified lipid-lowering effects, with greater LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and TC reductions in non-overweight/obese than in overweight/obese patients. CONCLUSION: Triple LLT was associated with more comprehensive control of atherogenic lipid markers, with a similar trend for IR markers. Notably, stratified intensification of LLT may support individualized risk-factor management in CAD, although cardiovascular outcome benefits require further validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bao et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in coronary artery disease (n=1,391). Triple lipid-lowering therapy (statin + ezetimibe + PCSK9 inhibitor) vs. Monotherapy or dual therapy was evaluated on Attainment rates and changes in lipid profiles and insulin resistance biomarkers (LDL-C, ApoB, non-HDL-C, RC, TC, TyG index, AIP). Triple lipid-lowering therapy achieved the largest reductions in LDL-C (-62.9%), non-HDL-C (-57.5%), ApoB (-56.1%), and remnant cholesterol (-45.1%) compared to dual or monotherapy in CAD patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: