Key result
Persistent side branch perfusion post-EVAR is linked to a ~38% rate of type II endoleaks.
Why the study?
Does the presence of perfused side branches influence the development of type II endoleaks and AAA volume changes after endovascular repair?
Cohort (n=89)
Does the presence of perfused side branches influence the development of type II endoleaks and AAA volume changes after endovascular repair?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Persistent side branch perfusion, particularly from patent lumbar arteries before endovascular repair, is significantly associated with the development of type II endoleaks and subsequent AAA volume changes.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the frequency and influence of perfused side branches (lumbar arteries [LA] and inferior mesenteric artery trunks) on development of type II endoleaks (EL-II) and on volume changes of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) after endovascular repair. METHODS: Of 114 patients undergoing EVR of AAA, 89 patients (83 men; mean age 72+/-7.5 years, range 51-88) with >6 months' follow-up and no type I endoleaks were retrospectively analyzed to determine any relationships between retrograde perfusion, endoleaks, and sac volume. Data were derived from computed tomographic angiographic (CTA) scans taken before and after intervention, at discharge, and at 1, 3, 6, and semi-annually thereafter in follow-up. Two groups were identified and compared based on their status at 6 months post EVR: without perfused side branches (group 1) and with perfused collaterals (group 2); group 2 was further divided according to the absence (2a) or presence (2b) of endoleak. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 24 months (range 6-36). Based on a total of 582 CTAs analyzed, 17 (19%) patients developed type II endoleaks (EL-II) during follow-up. There was a significant difference in the number of perfused LAs prior to EVR between groups 1 (n=44) and the 45 patients with postprocedural patent collateral arteries in group 2 (p<0.05); there was no significant difference between groups 2a and 2b (p=0.88) relative to the number of pre-existing patent collaterals. The number of pLAs preoperatively and the rate of type II endoleak were significantly correlated (p<0.05). No type II endoleak was seen in patients without perfused side branches (p=0.01). No significant differences in mean volumes were found between groups 1 and 2a (no EL-II), but significant differences between groups 1 and 2b were seen in later follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A larger number of patent LAs before EVR was associated with a significantly higher rate of type II endoleak. Patent collateral vessels were common after aneurysm repair, but the frequency decreased during follow-up. Persistent side branch perfusion was associated with increased type II endoleak after endovascular AAA repair. Significant differences in volume changes in later follow-up were seen between patients with or without type II endoleak.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fritz et al. (2004) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=89). Perfused side branches (lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery trunks) vs. No perfused side branches was evaluated on Development of type II endoleaks (p=0.01). Persistent side branch perfusion after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair was associated with a significantly higher rate of type II endoleaks compared to no perfusion (37.8% vs 0%; p=0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: