Key result
Preemptive embolization shows no significant benefit over control for preventing AAA enlargement post-EVAR.
Why the study?
The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive embolization of the lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery for preventing AAA enlargement associated with type 2 endoleak.
Does preemptive embolization of the lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery prevent AAA enlargement and type 2 endoleak in patients undergoing EVAR?
Cohort (n=145)
No
Does preemptive embolization of the lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery prevent AAA enlargement and type 2 endoleak in patients undergoing EVAR?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 77.5%
p-value: p=0.11
Preemptive embolization of the lumbar and inferior mesenteric arteries during EVAR significantly reduces the prevalence of type 2 endoleak at 1 year, suggesting a potential strategy to prevent endoleak-associated aneurysm enlargement.
PELI was associated with fewer T2ELs but not proven to prevent AAA enlargement; leaves open whether routine preemptive embolization improves post-EVAR outcomes.
Purpose: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive embolization (PE) of the lumbar arteries (LAs) and inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) (PELI) for preventing abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) enlargement associated with type 2 endoleak (T2EL). Material and Methods: Patients who underwent endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) between January 2015 and December 2020 were classified into the control (without PE), IMA (PE of a patent IMA with a diameter ≥2.5 mm), and PELI (PE of patent LAs with a diameter ≥2 mm and IMA) groups. The rate of freedom from AAA enlargement following EVAR (enlargement ≥5 mm from pre-EVAR) was compared using the log-rank test. The prevalence of T2EL at 6 months and 1 year after EVAR was compared using Fisher's exact test. Results: The cumulative rates of freedom from AAA enlargement at 54 months after EVAR (maximum observational period in the PELI group) were as follows: control group, 77.5%; IMA group, 62.5%; and PELI group, 100%. The mean CT follow-up periods of the control, IMA, and PELI groups were 46.4 ± 22.3, 31.1 ± 20.6, and 22.9 ± 15.5 months, respectively. None of the 31 patients in the PELI group experienced AAA enlargement after EVAR, whereas 2 out of the 16 patients in the IMA group and 20 out of the 98 patients in the control group had AAA enlargement. No significant differences were observed in the rate of freedom from AAA enlargement (PELI group vs. IMA group, P = 0.11; PELI group vs. control group, P = 0.11). The prevalence of T2EL was significantly lower in the PELI group than in the control group at 6 months (13.6% in PELI group vs. 42.1% in control group, P = 0.02) and 1 year (14.3% in PELI group vs. 40.0% in control group, P = 0.04). Conclusions: PELI was significantly associated with a low prevalence of T2EL and may prevent T2EL-associated AAA enlargement.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nakai et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Abdominal aortic aneurysm (n=145). Preemptive embolization of both lumbar arteries and inferior mesenteric artery (PELI) vs. Control (without preemptive embolization) was evaluated on Rate of freedom from AAA enlargement following EVAR (≥5 mm from pre-EVAR) at 54 months (p=0.11). Preemptive embolization of both lumbar arteries and the inferior mesenteric artery resulted in a 100% rate of freedom from abdominal aortic aneurysm enlargement compared to 77.5% in controls (P=0.11).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: