Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We fabricated mono-, seven-, and 19-filament MgB2composite wires by applying an internal Mg diffusion (IMD) process to Mg cores surrounded with B or B+SiC powder. A Ta or Nb tube and a Cu-Ni tube were used as the inner and outer sheaths, respectively. The wires were heated at 600-700 °C for 0.25-10 h. During the heat treatment, Mg diffused into the B layer and reacted with B to form MgB2and some impurity phases such as MgB4. The thickness of the reacted MgB2layer increased rapidly with increasing heat-treatment temperature and/or heat treatment time. The 10 mol% SiC monofilamentary wires had a critical current densityJc(calculated for the reacted layer) of over 105A/cm2at 4.2 K and 10 T in the early stage of heat treatment at 600-640 °C, despite the critical currentIcbeing as low as ~ 10 A. At this stage, only the B area near the Mg core reacted with Mg to form a thin MgB2layer; a large amount of B remained unreacted. The Vickers hardness of the reacted MgB2layer in the IMD-processed wires is about 1300, which is much higher than that in powder-in-tube (PIT) processed wires. This suggests that the MgB2layer has a much higher density than the PIT-processed wire. ExcellentJcvalues with highIcvalues can be obtained for multifilamentary wires when they were heated at ~ 640°C for 1 h. In this case, the B layer reacts almost completely with Mg to form MgB2. The seven- and 19-filament wires hadJcvalues of 0.7-1 × 105A/cm2at 4.2 K and 10 T and 1.3 × 105A/cm2at 20 K and 3 T. These highJcvalues are attributable to the high-density MgB2layer produced by the diffusion method.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumakura et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: