PURPOSE: Imaging carotid artery plaques to identify features of vulnerability typically requires a multicontrast MRI protocol. The identification of regions of inflammation with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO) nanoparticles requires separate pre- and postcontrast scans. We propose a method of joint water-fat separation and quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) to aid classification of atherosclerotic plaques and offer a positive contrast mechanism in USPIO-imaging. METHODS: Ten healthy volunteers (3 women and 7 men; aged, 30.7 ± 10.7 years) were imaged at 1.5T to develop an acquisition and postprocessing protocol. Five patients (1 woman and 4 men; mean age, 71 ± 7.5 years) with moderate to severe luminal stenosis were imaged pre- and postadministration of a USPIO contrast agent. We used a multiecho gradient echo acquisition to perform water/fat separation and subsequently QSM. The results were compared with a conventional multicontrast MRI protocol, CT images, and histopathology data. RESULTS: In the volunteer scans, a multiecho gradient echo acquisition with bipolar readout gradients demonstrated to be a reliable acquisition methodology to produce high-quality susceptibility maps in conjunction with the proposed postprocessing methodology. In the patient study, water/fat separation provided a tool to identify lipid-rich necrotic cores and QSM provided a qualitative and quantitative evaluation of plaque features and positive contrast when evaluating USPIO uptake. Plaque calcification could be identified by strong diamagnetism (-1.27 ± 0.71 ppm), while USPIO uptake demonstrated a strong paramagnetism (1.32 ± 0.61 ppm). CONCLUSION: QSM was able to identify multiple plaque features in a single acquisition, providing positive contrast for plaques demonstrating USPIO uptake and negative contrast for calcification.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ruetten et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: