Key result
IV amiodarone plus ibutilide improves cardioversion success to ~72% versus ibutilide alone in persistent AF.
Why the study?
Does pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone plus ibutilide improve cardioversion rates and sinus rhythm maintenance compared to ibutilide alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
RCT (n=79)
Randomized
No
Does pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone plus ibutilide improve cardioversion rates and sinus rhythm maintenance compared to ibutilide alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation?
Absolute Event Rate: 71.8% vs 51.3%
p-value: p=<0.05
Pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone significantly improves the efficacy and safety of ibutilide for the pharmacological cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation.
Supports amiodarone pretreatment before ibutilide for persistent AF; extends RCT evidence for combination pharmacological cardioversion.
The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy and safety of the pharmacological conversion of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) using amiodarone or/and ibutilide. Seventy-nine consecutive patients (48 males and 31 females; mean age, 64.6±11.2 years; range, 40-80 years) with non-valvular chronic AF lasting >7 days (range, 7-97 days) that were admitted to hospital for elective pharmacological cardioversion were randomly assigned to receive treatment with intravenous ibutilide (1 mg plus an additional 1 mg if required; n=39) or intravenous amiodarone (300 mg) plus intravenous ibutilide (1 mg; n=40). Success rates of cardioversion were 51.3% (20/39 patients) for ibutilide alone and 71.8% (28/39 patients) for amiodarone + ibutilide (P<0.05). A comparable increase in the QTc interval was observed in the two groups. It was observed that the co-administration of amiodarone and ibutilide was safer than ibutilide alone with regard to the risk of ventricular arrhythmia. Forty-eight patients of successful cardioversion were personally contacted for follow-up. The result indicated that the sinus rhythm maintenance time of the amiodarone + ibutilide group (4.36±2.44 months) was significantly higher than that of the ibutilide group (2.34±1.75 months; P<0.01). In conclusion, pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone + ibutilide for pharmacological cardioversion of persistent AF is considered to be more effective and safer than treatment with ibutilide alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dong et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Persistent atrial fibrillation (n=79). Amiodarone plus ibutilide vs. Ibutilide 1 mg alone was evaluated on Success rate of cardioversion (p=<0.05). Pretreatment with intravenous amiodarone plus ibutilide significantly improved the cardioversion success rate to 71.8% compared to 51.3% with ibutilide alone in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: