Key result
The CHIP-Family intervention did not significantly improve the psychosocial well-being or emotional and behavioural problems of young children with congenital heart disease and their families compared to care as usual at 6-month follow-up.
Why the study?
Children with congenital heart disease and their families risk psychosocial problems, prompting evaluation of the modified CHIP-Family intervention to prevent and decrease these issues.
RCT (n=93)
Single-blind
1:1, stratified by school year and CHD severity
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: Children with congenital heart disease and their families are at risk of psychosocial problems. Emotional and behavioural problems, impaired school functioning, and reduced exercise capacity often occur. To prevent and decrease these problems, we modified and extended the previously established Congenital Heart Disease Intervention Program (CHIP)-School, thereby creating CHIP-Family. CHIP-Family is the first psychosocial intervention with a module for children with congenital heart disease. Through a randomised controlled trial, we examined the effectiveness of CHIP-Family. METHODS: Ninety-three children with congenital heart disease (age M = 5.34 years, SD = 1.27) were randomised to CHIP-Family (n = 49) or care as usual (no psychosocial care; n = 44). CHIP-Family consisted of a 1-day group workshop for parents, children, and siblings and an individual follow-up session for parents. CHIP-Family was delivered by psychologists, paediatric cardiologists, and physiotherapists. At baseline and 6-month follow-up, mothers, fathers, teachers, and the child completed questionnaires to assess psychosocial problems, school functioning, and sports enjoyment. Moreover, at 6-month follow-up, parents completed program satisfaction assessments. RESULTS: Although small improvements in child outcomes were observed in the CHIP-Family group, no statistically significant differences were found between outcomes of the CHIP-Family and care-as-usual group. Mean parent satisfaction ratings ranged from 7.4 to 8.1 (range 0-10). CONCLUSIONS: CHIP-Family yielded high program acceptability ratings. However, compared to care as usual, CHIP-Family did not find the same extent of statistically significant outcomes as CHIP-School. Replication of promising psychological interventions, and examination of when different outcomes are found, is recommended for refining interventions in the future. TRIAL REGISTRY: Dutch Trial Registry number NTR6063, https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5780.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mheen et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Congenital heart disease (n=93). CHIP-Family intervention vs. Care as usual was evaluated on Child emotional and behavioural problems (Child Behavior Checklist total score reported by mothers) (p=0.084). The CHIP-Family intervention did not significantly improve the psychosocial well-being or emotional and behavioural problems of young children with congenital heart disease and their families compared to care as usual at 6-month follow-up.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: