Key result
Short-term HRV biofeedback shows no significant benefit over rehabilitation alone for one-year abstinence rates.
Why the study?
Does short-term heart rate variability biofeedback improve long-term abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence?
RCT (n=48)
Open-label
Randomized
No
Does short-term heart rate variability biofeedback improve long-term abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence?
Absolute Event Rate: 46.7% vs 33.3%
p-value: p=ns
Short-term HRV biofeedback in addition to standard rehabilitation showed a non-significant trend towards increased 1-year abstinence in alcohol-dependent patients.
Non-significant abstinence trend after HRV biofeedback; hypothesis-generating and leaves long-term efficacy open pending larger randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: A randomized controlled study (RCT) recently showed that short-term heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback in addition to standard rehabilitation care for alcohol dependence can reduce craving, anxiety and improve cardiovascular autonomic function. In this one-year follow-up study we aimed to explore whether completion of 2-week HRV-Biofeedback training is associated with long-term abstinence. Furthermore, we sought to identify potential predictors of post-treatment abstinence. METHODS: We conducted a survey on abstinence in patients with alcohol dependence 1 year after completion of an RCT comparing HRV-biofeedback in addition to inpatient rehabilitation treatment alone (controls). Abstinence rates were compared and analysed for association with demographic data as well as psychometric and autonomic cardiac assessment before and after completion of the biofeedback training using bivariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Out of 48 patients who participated in the RCT, 27 patients (9 females, ages 42.9 ± 8.6, mean ± SD) completed our one-year follow-up. When including in the analysis only patients who completed follow-up, the rate of abstinence tended to be higher in patients who underwent HRV-biofeedback 1 year earlier compared to those who received rehabilitative treatment alone (66.7% vs 50%, p = ns). This non-significant trend was also observed in the intention-to-treat analysis where patients who did not participate in the follow-up were assumed to have relapsed (46,7% biofeedback vs. 33.3% controls, p = ns). Neither cardiac autonomic function nor psychometric variables were associated with abstinence 1 year after HRV-biofeedback. CONCLUSION: Our follow-up study provide a first indication of possible increase in long-term abstinence after HRV-biofeedback for alcohol dependence in addition to rehabilitation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The original randomized controlled trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register ( DRKS00004618 ). This one-year follow-up survey has not been registered.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Penzlin et al. (2017) conducted an RCT in Alcohol dependence (n=48). Heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback vs. Standard rehabilitative care only was evaluated on Abstinence rate at 1 year (intention-to-treat) (p=ns). Short-term heart rate variability biofeedback in addition to rehabilitation showed a non-significant trend toward increased one-year abstinence rates compared to rehabilitation alone (46.7% vs 33.3%, p=ns).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: