Key result
Triplex PCR assay identifies ~38% PCV2 and PCV3 co-infection with no PCV4 detected.
Why the study?
Symptoms triggered by different genotypes of porcine circovirus resemble each other and are difficult to distinguish, creating a need for a rapid, accurate differential diagnostic assay.
May accelerate differential diagnosis of porcine circovirus genotypes; leaves open prospective field validation before routine adoption.
Porcine circovirus disease represents a prevalent ailment that is principally manifested by a series of clinical symptoms, including reproductive disorders in sows and high mortality rates in piglets. It has brought huge economic losses upon the global swine industry. Furthermore, the symptoms triggered by different genotypes of porcine circovirus bear resemblance and difficult to distinguish. Therefore, it is essential to establish a rapid, accurate, time-efficient, and high-throughput triplex real-time PCR differential diagnosis assay for detecting PCV2, PCV3, and PCV4. In this study, specific primers and probes were designed based on the conserved sequences of ORF1 sequences of PCV2, PCV3, and PCV4. The triplex Real-Time PCR assay was established and optimized, which showed satisfactory specificity, sensitivity, repeatability, and reproducibility. The limit of detection (LOD) was determined to 4.8×101 copies/μL. The correlation coefficients R2 exceeded 0.999, and no cross-infection was found with other porcine viral pathogens. In addition, both the intra-repeatability and inter-repeatability were lower than 2%, which further attests to the reliability and stability of this assay. The complete consistency of the detection results with those of the commercial single-plex real-time PCR kits indicates that the established assay has satisfactory accuracy. The established assay was next applied to detect 370 clinical samples that were collected from 2023 to 2024 in the northern Anhui province of China. The results showed that the positive rate of PCV2 was 81.35% (301/370), the positive rate of PCV3 was 72.43% (268/370), and the positive rate of co-infection of PCV2 and PCV3 was 38.37% (142/370). However, PCV4 was not detected. Therefore, the established triplex real-time PCR assay in this study provides a valuable tool for the detection of porcine circovirus, which facilitates the epidemiological investigation of porcine circovirus in China.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cheng et al. (2025) studied Porcine circovirus infection (n=370). Triplex real-time PCR assay vs. Commercial single-plex real-time PCR kits was evaluated on Detection rate of PCV2, PCV3, and PCV4. The established triplex real-time PCR assay detected PCV2 in 81.35% and PCV3 in 72.43% of clinical samples, with a 38.37% co-infection rate and no PCV4 detected.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: