Key result
Extensive aortic dissection presenting as ischemic stroke highlights the need for careful evaluation before thrombolysis.
Case Report (n=1)
Highlights the critical need to rule out aortic dissection before administering thrombolysis in patients presenting with acute ischaemic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case cautions against thrombolysis without excluding aortic dissection in acute stroke; leaves open optimal screening protocols for prospective study.
Acute aortic dissection complicated by stroke is not uncommon but may be difficult to evaluate, especially in patients with impaired mental status. We report a patient who had evidence of an ischaemic stroke but was fortuitously not given thrombolytic treatment. She was subsequently found to have an extensive aortic dissection involving both carotid arteries. The decision of whether to give thrombolytic treatment is understandably an urgent one, but careful attention should be paid to subtle signs and symptoms such as atypical chest pain and carotid bruits that might suggest aortic dissection, especially involving the carotid arteries. There should be a high index of suspicion for acute aortic dissection in such cases and a low threshold for performing carotid ultrasound.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yeh et al. (2007) conducted a case report in Acute aortic dissection complicated by ischaemic stroke (n=1). Thrombolytic treatment (withheld) was evaluated. A patient presenting with ischaemic stroke was found to have an extensive aortic dissection involving both carotid arteries, highlighting the need for careful evaluation before thrombolysis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: