Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The human leukocyte antigen (HLA) -DQ2.5, -DQ2.2 or -DQ8 allotypes are necessary for celiac disease (CeD) development. Their distribution may vary between adults with known, previously diagnosed CeD and newly diagnosed CeD detected through screening. METHODS: In the population-based HUNT4 study, 52,588 Norwegian adults were screened for CeD, identifying 846 (376 known, 465 new biopsy-confirmed and 163 potential) cases. Anti-TG2 seropositive subjects and a random sample of 1412 controls underwent HLA-DQA1- and HLA-DQB1-sequencing to infer relevant HLA-DQ allotypes. RESULTS: All new cases were DQ2 or DQ8 positive, while 21 known cases were DQ2 and DQ8 negative, suggesting misdiagnosis. Histological reassessment confirmed the diagnosis in 5/21. After adjusting known cases to 360, DQ2.5 frequencies were 87.8% in confirmed cases, 76.7% in potential cases, and 22.9% in controls. Among DQ2.5-negative subjects, DQ8 was most frequent, with 8.5% in confirmed cases and 10.4% in potential cases. DQ2.5/DQ2.5 carried the highest risk (odds ratio [OR] 16.7, 95% confidence interval 9.7-31.4), followed by DQ2.5/DQX (OR 5.7, 4.7-7.0), DQ8/DQ8 (OR 8.8, 4.6-16.8), and DQ8/DQX (OR 2.6, 1.7-3.8). ORs for DQ2.2/DQ2.2 and DQ2.2/DQX were 3.4 (0.5-15.0) and 0.8 (0.4-1.6), respectively. No clear differences were observed between known and new cases, however ORs for DQ2.5/DQX and DQ8 were higher in new cases. CONCLUSIONS: This study found a gene-dose effect for DQ2.5, DQ8, and DQ2.2 in both known and new cases, with a fairly high proportion of DQ8 for a Nordic population. A substantial proportion of DQ2 or DQ8 negative subjects among known cases, but absent in new cases, could be attributed to historical misdiagnosis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hjort et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: