Key result
Flecainide toxicity affects ~13% of patients, linked to metabolic retention factors, not structural heart disease.
Why the study?
Flecainide is effective for ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias, but its use is limited by concerns over potential severe toxicity.
What are the risk factors and markers associated with flecainide toxicity in clinical practice?
Cohort (n=300)
No
What are the risk factors and markers associated with flecainide toxicity in clinical practice?
Metabolic retention factors and ECG markers, rather than classic contraindications like structural heart disease, are the primary risk factors for flecainide toxicity in clinical practice.
Metabolic and ECG factors may better flag flecainide toxicity risk than structural disease; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
Background: Flecainide is an antiarrhythmic drug effective against both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. However, its use is limited by concerns over potential severe toxicity. This study aims to characterize flecainide toxicity in current clinical practice and identify its associated risk factors and markers. Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-centre analysis of all patients admitted to Brugmann Hospital, Brussels, Belgium during 2014-2022 who received flecainide and had a follow-up period of a minimum of 3 months. We compared baseline characteristics of patients who developed toxicity to flecainide with those of patients who did not. Results: A total of 300 patients were included; 39 (13%) developed flecainide toxicity, with a mortality rate of 18% among these cases. Several risk factors and markers were associated with toxicity, including baseline sinus bradycardia, chronic kidney disease, hepatic cirrhosis, drug interactions, left ventricular ejection fraction during treatment, baseline QT interval duration, and prolongation of QRS and QT intervals during treatment. Baseline ischemic or structural heart disease, with or without left ventricular dysfunction, did not emerge as a risk factor for toxicity. Conclusions: Flecainide toxicity remains of consequence as it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Classic contraindications, such as left ventricular dysfunction or structural heart disease, were not associated with an increased risk of toxicity. Instead, metabolic retention factors (chronic kidney disease, hepatic cirrhosis, or drug interactions) and preclinical markers of overdose (sinus bradycardia, left ventricular ejection fraction under treatment, baseline QT interval, and prolongation of QRS and QT intervals during treatment) increased the likelihood of toxicity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Khadir et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Patients receiving flecainide (n=300). Flecainide was evaluated on Flecainide toxicity. Flecainide toxicity occurred in 13% of treated patients and was associated with metabolic retention factors and preclinical markers, but not with classic structural heart disease.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: