Key result
TAVI in nonagenarians is not associated with higher 1-year mortality versus younger patients.
Why the study?
Nonagenarians are a fast-growing group among cardiovascular patients with aortic stenosis, but prognostic data following TAVI remain scarce.
Does age ≥ 90 years increase mortality in elderly patients undergoing TAVI compared to those aged 75-89 years?
Cohort (n=8,073)
Yes
Does age ≥ 90 years increase mortality in elderly patients undergoing TAVI compared to those aged 75-89 years?
TAVI is a safe and effective strategy in carefully selected nonagenarians, with 1-year adjusted all-cause mortality comparable to younger elderly patients.
Does not support age-based exclusion from TAVI; observational data leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
Introduction and objectives: Nonagenarians are a fast-growing age group among cardiovascular patients, especially with aortic stenosis, but data about their prognosis after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is scarce. The objective of our study is to analyze the baseline characteristics of nonagenarians treated with TAVI and determine whether age ≥ 90 years is associated with a worse prognosis compared to non-nonagenarian patients. Methods: We included all patients ≥75 years enrolled in the multicenter prospective Spanish TAVI registry between 2009 and 2018. Patients < 75 years were excluded. Results: A total of 8073 elderly patients (≥ 75 years) from 46 Spanish centers were enrolled in the Spanish TAVI registry; 7686 were between ≥ 75 and < 90 years old (95.2%), and 387 were nonagenarian patients (4.79%). A gradual increase of nonagenarians was observed. The transfemoral access was used in 91.6% of the cases, predominantly among the nonagenarian patients (91.4% vs 95.1%, P = .01). Nonagenarians were more likely to die during their hospital stay (4.3% vs 7.0% among nonagenarians, P = .01). However, no difference was seen in the all-cause mortality rates reported at the 1-year follow-up (8.8% vs 11.3%, P =.07). In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 90 years was not independently associated with a higher adjusted all-cause mortality rate (HR, 1.37, 95%CI, 0.91–1.97, P = .14). The baseline creatinine levels, and the in-hospital bleeding complications were all associated with a worse long-term prognosis in nonagenarians treated with TAVI. Conclusions: Nonagenarians are a very high-risk and growing population with severe AS in whom TAVI may be a safe and effective strategy. Careful patient selection by the TAVI heart team is mandatory to achieve maximum efficiency in this population where the baseline kidney function and bleeding complications may determine the long-term prognosis after TAVI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cepas‐Guillén et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in aortic stenosis (n=8,073). Age ≥ 90 years vs. Age ≥ 75 and < 90 years was evaluated on adjusted all-cause mortality rate (HR 1.37, 95% CI 0.91-1.97, p=.14). Among patients undergoing TAVI, age ≥90 years was not independently associated with a higher adjusted 1-year all-cause mortality rate compared to younger patients (HR 1.37; 95% CI 0.91-1.97; P=0.14).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: