Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aquatic photochemistry of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (T 4 CDF) and 2,3,4,7,8-pentachlorodibenzofuran (P 5 CDF) was studied in the laboratory using a xenon light source and under sunlight conditions at 50° N latitude at the Experimental Lakes Area of northwestern Ontario, Canada. Under midsummer sunlight conditions 3 H-T 4 4CDF and 14 C-P 5 CDF photolyzed slowly in 25:10 (v/v) distilled water/acetonitrile solutions with rate constants of 0.11 ± 0.01 and 0.015 ± 0.007 d - 1, respectively. Both congeners experienced enhanced degradation rates in lake water, with rate constants of 0.58 ± 0.05 and 3.6 ± 0.3 d - 1 . Photoproduct analysis confirmed reductive dechlorination as a degradative pathway for both PCDFs in lake water. Three T 4 CDFs were detected as photoproducts of 23478-P 5 CDF, with two of these products identified by GC/MS as 2368- and 2348-T 4 CDF. Similarly, one T 3 CDF was detected in the photolysis of 2378-T 4 CDF, although the specific congener was not identified. One polar photoproduct was detected in the photolysis of 23478-P 5 CDF in lake water. Although the identity of this product could not be confirmed, GC/MS analysis of the TMS derivative suggested a hydroxylated, completely dechlorinated compound with an apparent M + = 330 amu. Photolysis of nonchlorinated dibenzofuran in lake water yielded 2,2‘-dihydroxybiphenyl as photoproduct, with this product producing a trihydroxybiphenyl, tentatively identified as 2,2‘,3-trihydroxybiphenyl, under similar conditions. The results show that reductive dechlorination, C−O cleavage, and hydroxylation all play a role in the photolytic transformation of PCDFs and the dibenzofuran nucleus in natural water.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Friesen et al. (1996) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: