Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study is to compare the thermal comfort of traditional (Xhosa) huts and low-cost modern houses built under the reconstruction development program (RDP) and the influence of fly ash on brick properties and the indoor environment. A mixing proportion of 50% fly ash produces a brick with lower thermal conductivity and water absorption but with a higher compressive strength, while the clay plasticity decreases with the increase in fly ash. The results indicate that traditional huts offer better thermal comfort than low-cost modern houses, while the fly ash brick house (FABH) has a better thermal performance than the RDP house.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Makaka et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: