Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although some studies have explored the efficacy of cold forceps polypectomy (CFP) for diminutive colorectal polyps (DCPs) ≤3 mm, data on the efficacy and safety of multiple-bite CFP (MB-CFP) in antithrombotic-treated patients with DCPs ≤5 mm remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of MB-CFP in this patient cohort. METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at a single academic hospital. A total of 1201 consecutive patients with 2344 eligible polyps were enrolled. To fully evaluate the efficacy of MB-CFP, we defined histologic polyp eradication specifically according to the present study protocol to enable quantitative comparison. RESULTS: The mean number of bites in the MB-CFP group was 3.2. Both histologic and visual polyp eradication rates were comparable between the cold snare polypectomy (CSP) and MB-CFP groups (P>0.05). MB-CFP and CSP exhibited comparable polyp recurrence rates (P>0.05), both of which were lower than that in the single-bite CFP (SB-CFP) group (P<0.05). Tissue retrieval failure was higher in the CSP group than in the MB-CFP and SB-CFP groups (P<0.001). Adverse events (AEs) were comparable among the 3 groups (P>0.05). Logistic regression analysis identified polyp resection method, colorectal polyp classification, and polyp size as independent predictors of incomplete histologic polyp eradication (OR=5.100, 95% CI=1.985-13.103; OR=34.484, 95% CI=24.500-48.536; OR=0.188, 95% CI=0.132-0.266; all P≤0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: MB-CFP was effective and safe for the treatment of DCPs in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, with favorable outcomes regarding AEs and polyp recurrence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: