Key result
Evaluation of sphygmomanometers in two Iranian hospitals revealed that 39.6% had physical defects and 55.27% of the remaining devices were inaccurate compared to a standard mercury device.
Why the study?
Are sphygmomanometers used in tertiary educational hospitals accurate compared to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer?
Cross-Sectional (n=63)
Yes
Are sphygmomanometers used in tertiary educational hospitals accurate compared to a standard mercury sphygmomanometer?
A significant proportion of sphygmomanometers in clinical use are inaccurate, highlighting the need for regular calibration and maintenance to ensure accurate blood pressure measurement.
Background: Accurate blood pressure measurement has more importance in diagnosis, assessment of cardiovascular risk and efficacy of antihypertensive agents in hypertensive patients. Objectives: Present study was designed for sphygmomanometers accuracy assessment in two study hospitals. Materials and Methods: During the present cross sectional study, accuracy of 63 sphygmomanometers from two study hospitals was evaluated. Sphygmomanometer evaluation was performed according researcher prepared check list contains most of possible physical and functional defects. Accuracy detection in randomly selected sphygmomanometers was performed by comparison with one standard mercury sphygmomanometer. More than three mmhg pressure differences in two points or more than ten mmhg pressure difference in one point were considered as inaccurate sphygmomanometer. Results: Among sphygmomanometers, 25 (39.6%) devices had excluded due to physical defects. Air leak (15.9%) was most cause of sphygmomanometers exclusion from the study. According study accuracy determination method, among 38 sphygmomanometers, 21 (55.27%) devices were inaccurate and 17 (44.82%) devices were accurate. All of three mercury sphygmomanometers were accurate. Mean of errors in included sphygmomanometers was 4.98 mmhg and 34.2% of included sphygmomanometers in one point accuracy determination had more than 10 mmhg differences with standard sphygmomanometer. Conclusions: Current devices in our health care centers were inaccurate in most cases and might report wrong number as patients’ blood pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasrolahi et al. (2013) reported a cross-sectional. Sphygmomanometers vs. Standard mercury sphygmomanometer was evaluated on Inaccuracy (>3 mmHg difference in two points or >10 mmHg difference in one point). Evaluation of sphygmomanometers in two Iranian hospitals revealed that 39.6% had physical defects and 55.27% of the remaining devices were inaccurate compared to a standard mercury device.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: