Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In Brief BACKGROUND: Myoclonic movements are a common problem in unpremedicated patients during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. METHODS: In a double-blind fashion, 40 patients (ASA physical status III–IV) scheduled for elective cardioversion were randomly assigned to receive either 0.015 mg/kg midazolam or placebo 90 s before the injection of 0.3 mg/kg etomidate. Myoclonic movements and sedation were recorded on a scale between 0 and 3. Pulse oximetry, noninvasive arterial blood pressure, and heart rate were recorded during the study period. RESULTS: Two patients (10%) in the midazolam group had myoclonic movements after the administration of etomidate, whereas 10 of the 20 patients (50%) receiving placebo experienced such movements (P = 0.006). No other differences were found between the groups; in particular, there was no difference in recovery 5 min after the administration of etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: IV midazolam 0.015 mg/kg administered 90 s before induction of anesthesia with etomidate is effective in reducing myoclonic movements and does not prolong recovery in unpremedicated patients after short procedures. IMPLICATIONS: Myoclonic movements are a common problem in unpremedicated patients during induction of anesthesia with etomidate. We have shown that IV midazolam 0.015 mg/kg administered 90 s before induction of anesthesia with etomidate is effective in reducing myoclonic movements and does not prolong recovery in unpremedicated patients after short procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hüter et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: