Key result
CNN models trained on raw EEG achieve ~76% accuracy for schizophrenia diagnosis.
Why the study?
Deep learning models for automated schizophrenia diagnosis using raw EEG lack explainability, which is a critical component within a healthcare context.
Do explainable deep learning models applied to raw EEG identify relevant neurological biomarkers for schizophrenia diagnosis?
Do explainable deep learning models applied to raw EEG identify relevant neurological biomarkers for schizophrenia diagnosis?
Explainable deep learning models trained on raw EEG for schizophrenia diagnosis identify specific spatial and spectral features (T8/C3 electrodes, δ/γ bands) consistent with previous literature.
Supports EEG-based DL exploration in schizophrenia; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Schizophrenia (SZ) is a mental disorder that affects millions of people globally. At this time, diagnosis of SZ is based upon symptoms, which can vary from patient to patient and create difficulty with diagnosis. To address this issue, researchers have begun to look for neurological biomarkers of SZ and develop methods for automated diagnosis. In recent years, several studies have applied deep learning to raw EEG for automated SZ diagnosis. However, the use of raw time-series data makes explainability more difficult than it is for traditional machine learning algorithms trained on manually engineered features. As such, none of these studies have sought to explain their models, which is problematic within a healthcare context where explainability is a critical component. In this study, we apply perturbation-based explainability approaches to gain insight into the spectral and spatial features learned by two distinct deep learning models trained on raw EEG for SZ diagnosis for the first time. We develop convolutional neural network (CNN) and CNN long short-term memory network (CNN-LSTM) architectures. Results show that both models prioritize the T8 and C3 electrodes and the δ- and γ-bands, which agrees with previous literature and supports the overall utility of our models. This study represents a step forward in the implementation of deep learning models for clinical SZ diagnosis, and it is our hope that it will inspire the more widespread application of explainability methods for insight into deep learning models trained for SZ diagnosis in the future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ellis et al. (2022) studied Schizophrenia (n=101). Explainable deep learning models (CNN and CNN-LSTM) was evaluated on Balanced Accuracy (BACC) for schizophrenia diagnosis. Convolutional neural network (CNN) and CNN-LSTM models trained on raw EEG data achieved balanced accuracies of 75.7% and 70.0% for schizophrenia diagnosis, prioritizing T8 and C3 electrodes and δ- and γ-bands.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: