Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low-temperature laundering is promoted to reduce the environmental impact of domestic textile care; however, washing at ≤ 40 °C is insufficient for hygienic decontamination, rendering the drying stage critical, as microbial survival strongly depends on moisture availability and drying conditions. This study systematically investigates the antimicrobial efficacy of low-temperature washing combined with different drying methods under controlled, household-relevant conditions, and directly links hygiene performance to environmental impact using life cycle assessment (LCA). Cotton carriers inoculated with representative bioindicators were washed at 30 °C using a commercial detergent and subsequently dried by high- and low-temperature tumble drying, controlled indoor air drying, and simulated outdoor solar exposure (Xenotest). Low-temperature washing alone resulted in limited microbial reduction, whereas drying led to substantial additional inactivation. Both high- and low-temperature tumble drying eliminated most microorganisms (>7 log CFU cm⁻²), while simulated indoor air drying achieved significant reductions (∼6 log CFU cm⁻²), indicating that moisture reduction is a dominant mechanism of microbial inactivation, even without elevated drying temperatures. In this respect Xenotest treatment was less effective. The LCA showed that drying accounts for more than 50 % of the total environmental impact of the laundering process, with low-temperature tumble drying reducing overall impacts by approximately 20 % compared to high-temperature drying due to lower electricity consumption. By quantitatively linking microbial hygiene outcomes with environmental impacts, this study provides decision-relevant evidence for optimising domestic laundry practices, demonstrating that energy-efficient drying strategies can compensate for the hygienic limitations of low-temperature washing while significantly reducing the environmental footprint of textile care. • Domestic low-temperature washing does not meet hygiene standards. • Drying is essential for achieving hygiene, as all methods significantly reduced microorganisms. • High-temperature drying completely eliminated E. coli and C. albicans . • Low-temperature drying is effective and reduces environmental impact. • Combining low-temperature washing and drying provides hygiene and sustainability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fink et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: