Key result
Chlorpromazine substantially improves motor recovery in rats with spinal cord injury versus control.
Why the study?
Does chlorpromazine improve motor recovery in a rat spinal cord injury model?
Does chlorpromazine improve motor recovery in a rat spinal cord injury model?
Chlorpromazine administered prior to spinal cord contusion injury in rats significantly improves motor recovery and inhibits potassium efflux.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not change clinical practice in spinal cord injury; hypothesis-generating for chlorpromazine neuroprotection in contusion models.
The protective effect of chlorpromazine on rat spinal cord injury was investigated using a dynamic impact model. A 10 g weight was dropped 5 cm on an impounder placed on the exposed spinal cord at the T-11 level. Changes in potassium concentration on the epidural surface of the injured spinal cord were measured using a combined impounder-K+ electrode assembly. Recovery of motor performance was estimated using the modified Tarlov score. In the injury control (no treatment) group, the recovery was slow. Animals were still paralyzed 4 weeks after injury and none of them could walk; the Tarlov score was 1.88 +/- 0.78 (S.D.). In contrast, the chlorpromazine-treated group (20 mg/kg i.p. 30 min prior to injury) recovered significantly in 4 weeks. Animals could either support body weight or walk with some deficit; the Tarlov score was 4.0 +/- 0.35. Chlorpromazine inhibited potassium efflux from the spinal cord after contusion. Possible mechanisms of protection of neural cells by chlorpromazine are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sadanaga et al. (1989) studied Spinal cord contusion injury. Chlorpromazine vs. Injury control (no treatment) was evaluated on Recovery of motor performance estimated using the modified Tarlov score at 4 weeks. Chlorpromazine improved motor recovery in rats with spinal cord contusion injury compared to no treatment.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: