Key result
Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine resulted in no significant difference in median total PCA dose compared to rectus sheath catheters (270 vs 396 mg OME; p=0.54) after emergency laparotomy.
Why the study?
Rectus sheath catheters used for postoperative analgesia require substantial nursing time to maintain and top up, prompting evaluation of intraoperative single-shot liposomal bupivacaine to reduce nursing workload while preserving analgesic efficacy.
Does single-shot liposomal bupivacaine provide equivalent analgesia and length of stay compared to conventional bupivacaine via rectus sheath catheters in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Does single-shot liposomal bupivacaine provide equivalent analgesia and length of stay compared to conventional bupivacaine via rectus sheath catheters in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy?
Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine provides comparable postoperative analgesia to rectus sheath catheters after emergency laparotomy while potentially reducing nursing workload.
May support single-shot liposomal bupivacaine to reduce nursing workload; leaves open randomized confirmation of equivalence on analgesia and stay.
Opioid-sparing pain management is an integral component of enhanced recovery after colonic and rectal surgery. In our hospital, rectus sheath catheters (RSCs) are routinely placed during emergency laparotomy for colorectal procedures to allow a postoperative compartmental block of the surgical site with repeated doses of bupivacaine. However, RSCs require a significant amount of clinical nursing time to maintain and 'top-up'. We present a quality improvement project in which we administered single-shot liposomal bupivacaine (LB) intraoperatively as an alternative to bolus doses of conventional bupivacaine delivered through RSCs. Having thereby reduced the demands placed on nursing time through a reduction in the use of RSCs, we sought to establish whether there was any associated change in analgesic efficacy. Patient pain scores, use of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and length of stay following surgery were analysed before and after the introduction of LB. No disruption in these outcomes was identified using statistical process control analysis. A direct comparison of results for patients who received LB versus those who received bolus dosing of bupivacaine via RSCs found no significant differences, with a median total PCA dose of 270 mg oral morphine equivalents (OME) for patients who received LB versus 396 mg OME for patients who had RSCs (p=0.54). The median length of stay for patients who received LB was 15.5 days versus 16 days for those who had RSCs (p=0.87). We conclude that LB represents a viable alternative to boluses of conventional bupivacaine via RSCs in promoting enhanced recovery after emergency laparotomy and look to extend its use locally.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthews et al. (2024) studied Emergency laparotomy for colorectal procedures. Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine vs. Bolus doses of conventional bupivacaine via rectus sheath catheters was evaluated on Median total PCA dose (oral morphine equivalents) (p=0.54). Single-shot liposomal bupivacaine resulted in no significant difference in median total PCA dose compared to rectus sheath catheters (270 vs 396 mg OME; p=0.54) after emergency laparotomy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: