Key result
Polio SIAs inconsistently improve non-polio vaccine uptake despite poor integration into routine services.
Why the study?
The impact of polio supplementary immunisation activities on immunisation systems is frequently debated.
Do polio supplementary immunisation activities impact routine immunisation and health systems?
Systematic Review (n=20)
Do polio supplementary immunisation activities impact routine immunisation and health systems?
Polio SIAs successfully increase polio vaccine coverage and can strengthen workforce and community awareness, though resources are not always integrated into routine non-polio service delivery.
Polio SIAs may enhance non-polio uptake in targeted settings; extends evidence on selective benefits while leaving consistent integration unresolved.
INTRODUCTION: The Global Polio Eradication Initiative uses polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) as a strategy to increase vaccine coverage and cease poliovirus transmission. Impact of polio SIAs on immunisation systems is frequently debated. We reviewed the impact of polio SIAs on routine immunisation and health systems during the modern era of polio eradication. METHODS: We searched nine databases for studies reporting on polio SIAs and immunisation coverage, financial investment, workforce and health services delivery. We conducted a narrative synthesis of evidence. Records prior to 1994, animal, modelling or case studies data were excluded. RESULTS: 20/1637 unique records were included. Data on vaccine coverage were included in 70% (14/20) studies, workforce in 65% (13/20) and health services delivery in 85% (17/20). SIAs positively contributed to vaccination uptake of non-polio vaccines in seven studies, neutral in three and negative in one. Some polio SIAs contributed to workforce strengthening through training and capacity building. Polio SIAs were accompanied with increased social mobilisation and community awareness building confidence in vaccination programmes. Included studies were programmatic in nature and contained variable data, thus could not be justly critically appraised. CONCLUSION: Polio SIAs are successful at increasing polio vaccine coverage, but the resources and infrastructures were not always utilised for delivery of non-polio vaccines and integration into routine service delivery. We found a gap in standardised tools to evaluate SIAs, which can then inform service integration. Our study provides data to inform SIAs evaluations, and provides important considerations for COVID-19 vaccine roll-out to strengthen health systems. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020152195.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vassallo et al. (2021) conducted a systematic review in Polio (n=20). Polio supplementary immunisation activities (SIAs) was evaluated on Impact on routine immunisation coverage, workforce, and health services delivery. Polio supplementary immunisation activities positively contributed to non-polio vaccine uptake in 7 of 20 studies, but resources were not consistently utilized for routine service integration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: