Key result
Review evaluates alternative RV pacing sites for potential clinical advantages over traditional pacing methods.
Authors
Loading...
Guides prioritization of alternative RV pacing research; leaves open practice implications absent randomized confirmation.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Z. Leah Harris (2000) studied this question. Alternative right ventricular pacing sites are reviewed to evaluate their future clinical applications and potential advantages over traditional pacing methods.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: