Key result
Percutaneous management successfully treats an acute atrial lead perforation occurring over 1 year post-implantation.
Why the study?
This report aims to raise awareness of procedure-related complications in cardiovascular implantable electronic device patients, highlighting that electrode perforation risk is not restricted to the immediate post-implantation period.
Case Report (n=1)
Pleuritic or pericardial pain in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices should raise suspicion of electrode perforation, even years after implantation.
Alerts clinicians to delayed CIED lead perforation with tamponade; supports percutaneous repair yet leaves open incidence and predictors.
Key Clinical Message: Nonspecific symptoms such as pleuritic or pericardial chest pain in cardiovascular implantable electronic devices patients, even with unremarkable ECG or device parameters, should always raise suspicion of electrode perforation, regardless of how long ago the implantation was performed. Abstract: We report the successful percutaneous management of a 77-year-old woman who had a dual-chamber pacemaker implanted more than 1 year ago and presented with pericarditis pain and compensated pericardial hemorrhagic tamponade. The symptoms were due to very late acute perforation of the atrial lead. This report is intended to raise awareness of procedure-related complications in the large group of cardiovascular implantable electronic device patients. Pleuritic or pericardial pain in these patients should raise suspicion of electrode perforation, as the risk of perforation is not restricted to the period immediately after implantation and a lifelong risk cannot apparently be excluded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Waechter et al. (2023) conducted a case report in Atrial pacemaker electrode perforation (n=1). Dual-chamber pacemaker was evaluated. A 77-year-old woman was successfully treated via percutaneous management for a very late acute perforation of an atrial pacemaker lead occurring more than 1 year after implantation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: