Key result
Chordarizer ensures safe artificial chordae implantation during robotic mitral surgery by maintaining desired suture length.
Why the study?
Because ePTFE sutures are slippery, achieving adequate ligation without laxity is challenging in robotic mitral valve repair.
The Chordarizer device facilitates safe and reliable artificial chordae implantation during robotic mitral valve repair by preventing suture laxity.
May support precise chordal repair in robotic mitral surgery; leaves open need for comparative trials before adoption.
Artificial chordae implantation is an important technique for treating leaflet lesions in mitral valve repair. Considering that the expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) suture is slippery on the surface, adequate ligation without laxity should be critically considered, especially in robotic surgery. To resolve this issue, we applied a novel device that controls the length of an ePTFE suture (Chordarizer) for artificial chordae implantation in robotic mitral valve repair. After assessing the mitral valve via the right side of the left atrium, we stitched a CV-4 ePTFE suture to the target papillary muscle. Using a calliper, we measured the length of the artificial chordae and passed the CV-4 through the appropriate Chordarizer. Then, we stitched the CV-4 to the tip of the leaflet from the left ventricle side and tied it using da Vinci arms. Finally, the Chordarizer was peeled away. Chordarizer ensured safe and reliable artificial chordae implantation procedures with robotic mitral surgery, by maintaining the desired CV4 length.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tedoriya et al. (2020) studied Mitral valve leaflet lesions. Chordarizer device for artificial chordae implantation was evaluated on Safe and reliable artificial chordae implantation. The use of the Chordarizer device ensured safe and reliable artificial chordae implantation procedures during robotic mitral surgery by maintaining the desired suture length.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: