Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Spatial analysis reveals severe socioeconomic disadvantages alongside high ecological value across remote European rural areas, highlighting their potential alignment with regional conservation goals.
Remote rural areas are facing strong demographic and socioeconomic challenges as being far from a city can limit social and economic interaction opportunities. This study analyses the EU remote rural areas based on a set of selected indicators related to demographic, economic, accessibility, connectivity, biodiversity, land use and geographical context. Spatial cluster techniques revealed that half of the remote rural areas are in a disadvantaged situation because they performed poorly on most of the analysed indicators. Despite being remote, a few rural areas presented socioeconomic favourable conditions and high natural assets. This finding motivated our investigation to identify statistical differences between remote and non-remote areas by applying multivariate regression models. Our results showed that remote rural areas face major challenges in relation to transport infrastructures, internet speed, access to essential services, household income, population decline and ageing. On the contrary, their natural landscape and ecosystems, as well as agriculture and forestry can offer new opportunities to remote rural areas while contribute to the goals of the EU Green Deal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Barranco et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: