Key result
Perioperative dexmedetomidine lowers postoperative MAP to ~75 mmHg versus epidural during general anesthesia.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to investigate the influence of perioperative dexmedetomidine anesthesia on the prognosis of elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery.
Does perioperative dexmedetomidine combined with general anesthesia improve postoperative outcomes and prognosis in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery compared to epidural plus general anesthesia?
RCT (n=90)
Randomly divided
Does perioperative dexmedetomidine combined with general anesthesia improve postoperative outcomes and prognosis in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery compared to epidural plus general anesthesia?
p-value: p=<0.05
Perioperative dexmedetomidine combined with general anesthesia provides effective sedation and analgesia, reduces inflammatory responses, and shortens hospital stay in elderly patients undergoing gastrointestinal tumor surgery.
Supports hemodynamic stability with dexmedetomidine-general anesthesia in elderly GI surgery patients; extends RCT evidence versus epidural combinations.
It was to investigate the influence of perioperative dexmedetomidine (DEX) anesthesia on the prognosis of elderly patients with gastrointestinal tumor (GIT) surgery. 90 patients who underwent laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for GIT were included. They were randomly divided into the experimental group (45 cases) with DEX+general anesthesia, and the control group (45 cases) with epidural anesthesia+general anesthesia. The indicators after surgery were compared between the two groups. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) was 74.8 ± 3.5 mmHg and the heart rate (HR) was 52.7 ± 8.2 beats/min-1 in the experimental group, significantly lower than those of the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores of both groups decreased greatly associated to those before surgery ( P < 0.05 ). The levels of cortisol (COR) and immune adhesion inhibitor (FEIR) in the experimental group were significantly dissimilar from those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) was 96.4 ± 21.8 ng/L in the experimental group, observably lower than that in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). The postoperative diamine oxidase (DAO) and D-lactate (D-lac) were 62.4 ± 9.3 μmol/mL and 33.8 ± 7.2 ng/L, respectively, in the experimental group, much lower than those in the control group ( P < 0.05 ). There were also significant differences in the initial recovery of bowel sounds, defecation, and total length of hospital stay (LOHS) between the groups ( P < 0.05 ). DEX anesthesia had ideal sedative and analgesic effects, improving the prognosis of patients during surgery, and shortening the LOHS. Thus, it deserved a clinical application value.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Guo et al. (2022) conducted an RCT in Gastrointestinal tumor (n=90). Dexmedetomidine + general anesthesia vs. Epidural anesthesia + general anesthesia was evaluated on Mean arterial pressure (MAP) (p=<0.05). Perioperative dexmedetomidine plus general anesthesia significantly lowered postoperative mean arterial pressure (74.8 ± 3.5 mmHg) compared to epidural plus general anesthesia (P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: