Key result
Morphometric old age is linked to ~142% higher 1-year postoperative mortality risk versus middle age.
Why the study?
Does morphometric age assessed by preoperative CT predict 1-year postoperative mortality and length of stay in patients undergoing inpatient general and vascular abdominal surgery?
Cohort (n=1,370)
No
Does morphometric age assessed by preoperative CT predict 1-year postoperative mortality and length of stay in patients undergoing inpatient general and vascular abdominal surgery?
Odds Ratio: 2.42 (95% CI 1.52–3.84)
p-value: p=< 0.001
Morphometric age derived from preoperative CT scans is a strong predictor of 1-year mortality and length of stay, outperforming chronologic age in surgical risk assessment.
Morphometric old age signals elevated postoperative mortality risk; leaves open its added value for risk stratification in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND: A cornerstone of a surgeon's clinical assessment of suitability for major surgery is best described as the "eyeball test." Preoperative imaging may provide objective measures of this subjective assessment by calculating a patient's morphometric age. Our hypothesis is that morphometric age is a surgical risk factor distinct from chronologic age and comorbidity and correlates with surgical mortality and length of stay. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study within a large academic medical center. Using novel analytic morphomic techniques on preoperative CT scans, a morphometric age was assigned to a random sample of patients having inpatient general and vascular abdominal surgery from 2006 to 2011. The primary outcomes for this study were postoperative mortality (1-year) and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: The study cohort (n = 1,370) was stratified into tertiles based on morphometric age. The postoperative risk of mortality was significantly higher in the morphometric old age group when compared with the morphometric middle age group (odds ratio 2.42, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.84, p < 0.001). Morphometric old age patients were predicted to have a LOS 4.6 days longer than the morphometric middle age tertile. Similar trends were appreciated when comparing morphometric middle and young age tertiles. Chronologic age correlated poorly with these outcomes. Furthermore, patients in the chronologic middle age tertile found to be of morphometric old age had significantly inferior outcomes (mortality 21.4% and mean LOS 13.8 days) compared with patients in the chronologic middle age tertile found to be of morphometric young age (mortality 4.5% and mean LOS 6.3 days, p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative imaging can be used to assign a morphometric age to patients, which accurately predicts mortality and length of stay.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Englesbe et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Inpatient general and vascular abdominal surgery (n=1,370). Morphometric old age vs. Morphometric middle age was evaluated on 1-year postoperative mortality (OR 2.42, 95% CI 1.52 to 3.84, p=< 0.001). Morphometric old age was associated with a significantly higher 1-year postoperative mortality risk compared with morphometric middle age (OR 2.42; 95% CI 1.52-3.84; p<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: