Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Starting with a zirconium salt and LH2, (pydaH2)2+(pydc)2−, (pyda=2, 6‐pyridinediamine; pydcH2=2,6‐pyridinedicarboxylic acid), as a 1:1 proton transfer self‐associated compound, two different compounds were resulted. One of them is a new complex of ZrIV with a flat pyridine containing ligand and structure of (pydaH)2[Zr(pydc)3] · 5H2O (1) and the other, (pydaH)+(NO3)− (2) is an ion pair with no zirconium ion. The zirconium(IV) complex (1) is crystallized in triclinic system with P 1 space group and Z = 2, the crystallographic parameters are: a = 10.612(5) Å, b = 10.617(5) Å, c = 16.815(8) Å, α = 103.654(9)°, β = 95.821(9)°, γ = 98.891(9)° and R‐value for 16767 collected reflections is 0.0592. The ion pair (2) has crystals of monoclinic system with P21 space group and Z = 2. Its crystallographic parameters are: a = 3.6227(11) Å, b = 10.034(4) Å, c = 10.296(4) Å, β = 93.422(9)° and R‐value for 4031 collected reflections is 0.0521. The two compounds were characterized with elemental analysis, ESI/MS, NMR and IR spectroscopy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aghabozorg et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: