Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 2, 2023Medical ScienceOpen Access

Comparison of post-operative hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcome between dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail in intertrochanteric fracture

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Key result

Dynamic Hip Screw fixation links to better functional outcomes versus proximal femoral nails in younger patients.

  • n=30

Why the study?

This study aimed to evaluate the influence of femoral offset restoration on hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcomes in patients operated for intertrochanteric fracture.

Does Dynamic Hip Screw fixation improve post-operative hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcome compared to proximal femoral nail in patients with intertrochanteric fracture?

Population

Patients ≥18 years of age operated for intertrochanteric fracture and referred for physiotherapy

Comparison

Dynamic hip screw vs proximal femoral nail

Design

Prospective cohort study

Follow-up

6 months

Authors

NPNiketa PatelPGParesh Golwala

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

May support offset restoration to preserve abductor strength after intertrochanteric fixation; hypothesis-generating for functional gains, needing randomized trials.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=30)

Multicenter

No

Structured PICO

Does Dynamic Hip Screw fixation improve post-operative hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcome compared to proximal femoral nail in patients with intertrochanteric fracture?

P
Population
30 adult patients (mean age 64 years) operated for intertrochanteric femur fractures, followed for 6 months to assess the impact of femoral offset restoration on muscle strength and functional outcomes.
E
Exposure
Dynamic Hip Screw fixation
C
Comparator
Proximal femoral nail
O
Outcome
Hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcomes (gait parameters, unilateral stance test, Harris Hip Score) at 6 monthssurrogate

Dynamic Hip Screw fixation may provide better functional outcomes and hip abductor strength compared to other surgeries in young patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

Cite This Study

Patel et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Intertrochanteric femur fracture (n=30). Restoration of femoral offset vs. Unrestored femoral offset was evaluated on Hip abductor muscle strength and functional outcome (Harris Hip Score) at 6 months. Patients with restored femoral offset following intertrochanteric fracture surgery exhibited improved hip abductor muscle strength, with Dynamic Hip Screw fixation showing better functional outcomes in younger patients.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa3e29362d1fdab09554f93https://doi.org/10.54905/disssi/v27i135/e239ms3024
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Hip Abductor Muscle Strength Recovery: A Comparison Between Joint Replacement Surgery and Internal Fixation Surgery2024 · 1 citations
  2. 2A Comparative Study of Dynamic Hip Screw Versus Proximal Femoral Nailing in Surgical Management of Trochanteric Fractures in a Tertiary Care Centre, Thrissur District, Kerala2021
  3. 3Functional outcome of Dynamic Hip Screw versus Proximal Femoral Nail in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur2025
  4. 4Proximal femoral nailing versus dynamic hip screw device for trochanteric fractures - A comparative study2017 · 2 citations
  5. 5Outcome of Dynamic Hip Screw Fixation in Patients with Fractures Related to Intertrochanteric Femur2022