Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The past two or three decades have witnessed an intense interest in rediscovering Asian theories of communication and exploring their applicability to modern communication studies. I myself have been deeply involved in this project for the past thirty years. While this should be welcomed as a much-needed project, it is imperative that we realize that this effort is as important as it is complex and many-sided; there are several perilous pitfalls in the way such as those presented by romanticism, essentialism and ahistoricism. In this article, I discuss some of these issues, and the ways in which we can profitably engage Western formulations of communication, in relation to what I term Type A and Type B theories.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wimal Dissanayake (2009) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: