Key result
A three-electrode right atrium and coronary sinus common cathode reduces defibrillation energy ~21% versus control.
Why the study?
Does a transvenous defibrillating system utilizing a coronary sinus catheter reduce defibrillation energy thresholds in normal mongrel dogs?
Population
14 normal mongrel dogs
Comparison
Transvenous defibrillation using a coronary… vs Transvenous defibrillation using the proximal…
Design
Preclinical
Authors
Loading...
Hypothesis-generating in canine models; leaves open whether coronary sinus cathodes improve human ICD defibrillation thresholds or outcomes.
Does a transvenous defibrillating system utilizing a coronary sinus catheter reduce defibrillation energy thresholds in normal mongrel dogs?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.4% vs 27.1%
p-value: p=<0.01
A three-electrode transvenous defibrillation system utilizing the coronary sinus and superior vena cava as a common cathode significantly reduces defibrillation energy thresholds in a canine model.
Kadish et al. (1989) studied this question. Three-electrode system with high right atrium and coronary sinus as common cathode (Configuration C) vs. Superior vena cava to right ventricular apex system (Configuration A) was evaluated on Mean defibrillation energy at which 50% or more of the shocks were successful (joules) (p=<0.01). A three-electrode system with the high right atrium and coronary sinus serving as the common cathode reduced mean defibrillation energy compared to control (21.4 vs 27.1 joules; P<0.01).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: