Key result
Bilateral internal thoracic artery CABG yields similar hospital mortality to single internal thoracic artery grafting.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to assess the immediate results of using two internal thoracic arteries during coronary bypass surgery.
Does bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting improve immediate postoperative outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG?
Cohort (n=200)
No
Does bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting improve immediate postoperative outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 1%
p-value: p=>0.05
Bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting is safe and does not significantly increase hospital mortality or early postoperative complications compared to single internal thoracic artery grafting.
Small non-randomized CABG series; leaves open whether bilateral ITA improves immediate outcomes versus standard conduits.
The OBJECTIVEof the study was to assess the immediate results of the use of two internal thoracic arteries during coronary bypass surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS. 200 patients with coronary artery disease underwent coronary artery bypass grafting in Samara cardiology dispensary from 2016 to 2018. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group 1 (100 people) used both internal thoracic arteries (ITA) and the radial artery as conduits; group 2 (100 people) used the left ITA and the great saphenous vein as conduits. The duration of the operation, complications in the early postoperative period, and hospital mortality were evaluated. RESULTS. Groups (1 – 73 % of men, average age (59±12) years, average number of conduits – (3.1±0.4), 2 – 62 % of men, average age (67±7) years, average number of conduits – (3.3±0.6)) were significantly different only in age. The average duration of the operation in the group 1 was (174±25) min, in 2 – (165±18) min (p<0.05). Hospital mortality in the group 1 – 0 %, in 2 – 1 % (p>0.05). The number of complications in the early postoperative period did not have a statistically significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION. Bilateral internal thoracic arteries coronary artery bypass grafting in CHD patients did not lead to a significant increase in the duration of the operation, an increase in mortality and infectious complications from the sternum, compared with single internal thoracic arteries grafting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuznetsov et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease (n=200). Bilateral internal thoracic arteries and radial artery conduits vs. Left internal thoracic artery and great saphenous vein conduits was evaluated on Hospital mortality (p=>0.05). Bilateral internal thoracic artery coronary bypass grafting resulted in similar hospital mortality (0% vs 1%, p>0.05) compared with single internal thoracic artery grafting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: