Key result
The 2000 ACLS guidelines incorporate evidence-based changes for treating pulseless VT/VF, including new recommendations for the use of vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone.
This review summarizes the evidence supporting the addition of vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone to the 2000 ACLS guidelines for pulseless VT/VF.
May warrant consideration in pulseless VT/VF resuscitation; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of vasopressin and amiodarone.
Despite the use of conventional treatment modalities, the probability of survival for patients experiencing cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT) remains quite poor. Therefore, the management of cardiac arrest remains a challenge. The most recent Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) guidelines have adopted an evidence-based approach toward the treatment of pulseless VT/VF. A number of evidence-based changes have been made in the treatment algorithms for these life-threatening arrhythmias, including the new recommendations for using vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone. This article will provide an overview of the evidence-based approach that was used in the development of the 2000 ACLS guidelines and will summarize the key trials that were used to support the inclusion of vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone in the pulseless VT/VF treatment algorithm. Additionally, dosing and administration issues for these agents will be discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cynthia A. Sanoski (2002) conducted a review in Cardiac arrest due to ventricular fibrillation (VF) or pulseless ventricular tachycardia (VT). Vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone was evaluated. The 2000 ACLS guidelines incorporate evidence-based changes for treating pulseless VT/VF, including new recommendations for the use of vasopressin and intravenous amiodarone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: