Key result
Acute taVNS fails to affect subjective food wanting or liking compared to sham stimulation.
Why the study?
Despite preclinical evidence that vagal afferent satiety signals guide food intake, human evidence remains largely inconclusive.
Does acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation affect subjective ratings of wanting and liking of food in healthy participants?
RCT (n=82)
Single-blind
Randomized order of stimulation conditions
No
Does acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation affect subjective ratings of wanting and liking of food in healthy participants?
Mean Difference: 1.75 (95% CI -0.43–3.93)
p-value: p=0.113
Acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation does not significantly alter subjective food craving or liking in healthy participants, suggesting it is an unlikely mechanism for the reported long-term effects of VNS on body weight.
No support for acute taVNS altering food ratings in healthy adults; leaves open alternative mechanisms for reported VNS effects on weight.
The vagus nerve plays a vital role in the regulation of food intake and vagal afferent signals may help regulate food cue reactivity by providing negative homeostatic feedback. Despite strong evidence from preclinical studies on vagal afferent “satiety” signals in guiding food intake, evidence from human studies is largely inconclusive to date. Here, we investigated the acute effects of left or right transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) on subjective ratings of wanting and liking of various food and non-food items in 82 healthy participants (46 women, M BMI = 23.1 kg/m 2 ). In contrast to previous reports in patients with depression, we found moderate to anecdotal evidence supporting the absence of taVNS-induced changes in food ratings. To test whether the absence of taVNS effects on food ratings is due to heterogeneity in the sample, we conducted post hoc subgroup analyses by splitting the data according to stimulation side and sex (between-subject factors) as well as caloric density, perceived healthiness, and flavor (sweet vs. savory) of the food (within-subject factors). This multiverse analysis largely supported the absence of taVNS-induced changes since the strongest subgroup effects provided only anecdotal evidence in favor of taVNS-induced changes. We conclude that acute taVNS only has a marginal effect on subjective ratings of food, suggesting that it is an unlikely mechanism for the reported long-term effects of VNS on body weight. In light of an absence of acute taVNS effects on food craving, our results call for future research on the correspondence between acute and chronic effects of vagal afferent stimulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Müller et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy participants (n=82). Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) vs. Sham stimulation (electrodes at ear lobe) was evaluated on Cue-induced food wanting ratings (MD 1.75, 95% CI -0.43 to 3.93, p=0.113). Acute transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation did not significantly affect subjective ratings of food wanting (MD 1.75, p=0.113) or liking compared to sham stimulation in healthy participants.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: