Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
May 1, 2003International Endodontic Journal

A comparative study of root canal preparation using FlexMaster and HERO 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MHMichael HülsmannUniversity of ZurichGGGrit GreßmannFSF. SchäfersUniversity of Göttingen

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Hülsmann et al. (2003) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa3ea289fb7966fc9749857https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00664.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Comparative Scanning Electron Microscopic Investigation of the Efficacy of Manual and Automated Instrumentation of Root Canals2000 · 118 citations
  2. 2An in vitro evaluation of canal preparation using Profile .04 and .06 taper instruments1998 · 42 citations
  3. 3A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni–Ti instruments2001 · 155 citations
  4. 4Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper <i>Series</i> 29 rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 21997 · 236 citations
  5. 5Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper <i>Series 29</i> rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 11997 · 160 citations