Key result
Recent rAAA repair linked to ~28% lower 5-year mortality compared to earlier eras.
Why the study?
Management of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms has shifted substantially from open repair to EVAR over recent decades, enabling treatment of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities.
Has long-term survival after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms improved over time in Sweden?
Cohort (n=8,928)
Yes
Has long-term survival after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms improved over time in Sweden?
Hazard Ratio: 0.72
Absolute Event Rate: 43% vs 36%
p-value: p=< 0.001
Long-term survival after repair of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in Sweden has improved significantly over a 24-year period, coinciding with an increased use of endovascular repair.
Improved survival after rAAA repair supports evolving care; retrospective data leave causal factors open to prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate long-term survival after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) repair in Sweden during twenty-four years (1994-2017). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Management of rAAA has seen significant changes in the past decades, with the shifting from open (OAR) to endovascular (EVAR) being the most striking, thereby enabling treatment of elderly patients with multiple comorbidities. METHODS: A registry-based nationwide cohort study was performed, and three 8-year periods (1994-2001, 2002-2009, 2010-2017) were compared for crude long-term survival with Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox proportional hazards analyses. Relative survival compared to matched general population referents was estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 8928 rAAA repair subjects were identified (1994-2001 N = 3368; 2002-2009 N = 3405; 2010-2017 N = 2155). The proportion of octogenarians (20.6%; 27.5%; 34.0%; P < 0.001), women (14.3%; 18.5%; 20.6%; P < 0.001), and EVAR procedures (1.5%; 14.9%; 35.5%; P < 0.001) increased over time. The crude 5-year survival was 36%; 44%; 43% (P < 0.0001). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analysis displayed a decreasing mortality hazard ratio (HR) over time (1.00; 0.80; 0.72; P < 0.001). Use of EVAR was associated with reduced hazards of crude long-term mortality (HR = 0.80, P < 0.001). Relative survival for patients surviving the perioperative period (ie, 90 days) was lower than matched general population referents, and was stable over time (relative 5-year survival: 86% vs 88%, vs 86% P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Nationwide analysis of long-term outcomes after repair of rAAA in Sweden during 24 years (1994-2017) has revealed that, despite changes in the baseline population characteristics as well as in the treatment strategy, long-term survival improved over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
D’Oria et al. (2021) conducted a cohort in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (n=8,928). Later time periods (2010-2017) vs. 1994-2001 period was evaluated on crude 5-year survival (HR 0.72, p=< 0.001). Long-term survival after ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair improved over time, with 5-year survival increasing from 36% in 1994-2001 to 43% in 2010-2017 (mortality HR 0.72; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: