Key result
Elderly female sex links to ~24% lower 12-month MACE risk versus males after STEMI PPCI.
Why the study?
Does female sex compared to male sex affect the incidence of MACE in elderly patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Cohort (n=337)
Yes
Does female sex compared to male sex affect the incidence of MACE in elderly patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention?
Absolute Event Rate: 12.8% vs 16.8%
p-value: p=0.04
Elderly female patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention have favorable 12-month outcomes compared to elderly males, with lower rates of cumulative MACE.
Several epidemiological and clinical studies have shown that females with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) have a higher mortality than males following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Many analyses of sex-based differences following STEMI have revealed conflicting results. Currently, more and more elderly patients with STEMI have undergone emergency interventional therapy. From January 2014 to December 2016, a total of 337 elderly patients with STEMI were enrolled in this study from two chest pain centers, and all patients underwent PPCI. Patients were divided into two groups: elderly females (n=117, mean age 73.4±9.6 years) and elderly males (n=220, mean age 71.7±8.6 years). The prevalence of diabetes was higher in females than in males (29.1% vs. 19.6%,P<0. 01). Typical ischemic chest pain was lower in females than in males (45.3% vs 57.3%, P<0.01). The number of nonsmokers was also significantly higher in females than in males (5.1% vs. 52.3%,P<0. 01). Serum creatinine (sCr) levels (87.6±17.4 umol/L vs 99.5±20.2 umol/L,P<0.01) and body mass index (23.8±2.7 vs 27.3±3.1, P<0.01) were lower in females than in males. The incidences of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in-hospital showed no significantly difference (P>0.05) between the two groups. However, the cumulative MACE showed a significant difference between the two groups in the 12-month follow-up (16.8% in male vs 12.8% in female, P = 0.04). Our results suggest that the PPCI is safe and effective in elderly female STEMI patients. The cumulative MACE in females are not higher than in males. PPCI are helpful in elderly STEMI patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
You et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (n=337). Female sex vs. Male sex was evaluated on Cumulative major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 12 months (p=0.04). Elderly female patients with STEMI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention had a significantly lower rate of cumulative major adverse cardiac events at 12 months compared to males (12.8% vs 16.8%, p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: