This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The dominant non-dimensional parameter for isodensity transverse jet flow is the mean jet-to-crossflow velocity ratio,R. In Part 1 (Megerianet al.,J. Fluid Mech., vol. 593, 2007, p. 93), experimental results are presented for the behaviour of transverse-jet near-field shear-layer instabilities for velocity ratios in the range 1 <R≤ 10. A local linear stability analysis is presented in this paper for the subrangeR>4, using two different base flows for the transverse jet. The first analysis assumes the flow field to be described by a modified version of the potential flow solution of Coelho & Hunt (J. Fluid Mech., vol. 200, 1989, p. 95), in which the jet is enclosed by a vortex sheet. The second analysis assumes a continuous velocity model based on the same inviscid base flow; this analysis is valid for the larger values of Strouhal number expected to be typical of the most unstable disturbances, and allows prediction of a maximum spatial growth rate for the disturbances. In both approaches, results are obtained by expanding in inverse powers ofRso that the free-jet results are obtained asR→∞. The results from both approaches agree in the moderately low-frequency regime. Maximum spatial growth rates and associated Strouhal numbers extracted from the second approach both increase with decreasing velocity ratioR, in agreement with the experimental results from Part 1 in the range 4
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alves et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: