Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Liver transplantation (LT) is increasingly performed in the setting of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). In this context, pre-transplant evaluation must be completed rapidly while minimizing the risk of overlooking contraindications. We aimed to describe current practices for pre-transplant assessment in patients with ACLF. METHODS: We conducted a survey across 34 European LT centers (including 16 French) and 22 French non-LT centers to assess pre-transplant evaluation practices, focusing on cardiopulmonary, addiction, oncological, and nutritional assessments. Practices were compared across three clinical scenarios: outpatients (OutPat), hospitalized decompensated patients without ACLF (Hosp), and patients with ACLF admitted to intensive care units (ACLF-ICU). In parallel, we retrospectively evaluated post-transplant outcomes in patients with cirrhosis and severe ACLF transplanted in two high-volume centers. RESULTS: Fifty-three centers (96%) responded. Cardiological stress testing was reported in 2% of ACLF-ICU patients vs. 21% of OutPat (p = 0.002) vs. 17% of Hosp patients (p = 0.008). Coronary angiography following abnormal non-invasive testing was less frequently performed in ACLF (42%) than in OutPat (76%, p = 0.0004) or Hosp patients (66%, p = 0.01). Alcohol abstinence requirements were more often decided on a case-by-case basis in patients with ACLF (62%) than in OutPat or Hosp patients. Oncological screening, including colonoscopy and ear, nose, and throat consultation, was also less frequently performed in ACLF-ICU patients. Median time from assessment initiation to listing was 7 days in ACLF-ICU vs. 45 days in OutPat and 18 days in Hosp patients (both p <0.0001). In the retrospective cohort (n = 221), patients listed after ACLF onset had a higher 1-year incidence of cardiovascular events than those listed before ACLF onset (19% vs. 9%). CONCLUSIONS: In ACLF-ICU patients, pre-transplant evaluation is markedly abbreviated, with critical gaps-particularly in cardiological assessment-highlighting the need for dedicated, evidence-based guidelines. IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS: We sent a questionnaire to centers with an expertise in the management of patients with ACLF to assess current practices in pre-transplant evaluation in patients with ACLF admitted to an intensive care unit, as compared with patients without (outpatients and patients hospitalized in a regular ward). According to the responses from 53 centers, cardiological stress test and coronary angiography were less commonly performed as part of the pre-transplant evaluation in patients with ACLF admitted to the ICU, as well as colonoscopy and ear, nose, and throat consultation. Median timeframe from pre-LT workup initiation to listing was 7 days in patients with ACLF admitted to the ICU, which was significantly shorter than in patients without ACLF. These results suggest that pre-transplant workup is abbreviated in patients with ACLF, and might have an impact on post-transplant outcome, especially cardiovascular complications. Further dedicated studies are needed to specifically address the relation between pre-transplant workup and post-LT complications in patients with ACLF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bellec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: