This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Accurate soil analysis plays a crucial role in fertilizer recommendations. Conventional soil analysis is time-consuming, requires chemicals, and does not provide real-time soil nutrient status. In this context, spectroscopy offers a promising alternative, enabling simultaneous assessment of multiple soil properties. Therefore, the study objective was to evaluate the potential of Near-Infrared (NIR) spectroscopy to predict soil properties and its applicability to fertilizer recommendations for seven crops. A total of 1167 soil samples were collected from different land-uses. The samples were analyzed by conventional method, and NIR and prediction models were developed using five algorithms: Random Forest (RF), Cubist, Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and Memory-Based Learning (MBL). The MBL outperformed other models in predicting soil attributes. The results showed strong prediction accuracy for total nitrogen (TN) (R 2 = 0.84, RMSE = 0.05, RPD = 2.50, Bias = 0.00), organic matter (OM) (R 2 = 0.81, RMSE = 9.07, RPD = 2.27, Bias = 0.20), and electrical conductivity (EC) (R 2 = 0.79, RMSE = 2.05, RPD = 2.27, Bias = 0.12), while moderate for pH, available phosphorus, potassium (K), magnesium (Mg), and calcium (Ca) (R 2 < 0.68, RMSE < 310.58, RPD < 1.74, Bias < 0.92). Compared with wet-chemistry results, average differences in fertilizer recommendations for seven crops based on NIR were within acceptable limits (N: 3.6%, P: 7.7%, and K: 9.7%). Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of NIR as a cost-effective and reliable tool for soil assessment, enabling efficient fertilizer recommendations and supporting sustainable agriculture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vyavahare et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: