Key result
National implementation interventions linked to an ~18-fold increase in ischemic stroke IV thrombolysis rates.
Why the study?
Intravenous thrombolysis utilization in stroke remains low in many countries, prompting this study to identify national implementation targets for its logistics and utilization.
Do multicomponent interventions improve the utilisation and door-to-needle times of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke?
Observational
Yes
Do multicomponent interventions improve the utilisation and door-to-needle times of intravenous thrombolysis in ischemic stroke?
National multicomponent interventions can successfully increase intravenous thrombolysis rates to over 20% and reduce median door-to-needle times to near 20 minutes for ischemic stroke.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the real-world logistical barriers to optimal stroke care; leaves open whether these multicomponent interventions can.
INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the implementation gap would facilitate the use of intravenous thrombolysis in stroke, which is still low in many countries. The study was conducted to identify national implementation targets for the utilisation and logistics of intravenous thrombolysis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Multicomponent interventions by stakeholders in health care to optimise prehospital and hospital management with the goal of fast and accessible intravenous thrombolysis for every candidate. Implementation results were documented from prospectively collected cases in all 45 stroke centres nationally. The thrombolytic rate was calculated from the total number of all ischemic strokes in the population of the Czech Republic since 2004. RESULTS: Thrombolytic rates of 1.3 (95%CI 1.1 to 1.4), 5.4 (95%CI 5.1 to 5.7), 13.6 (95%CI 13.1 to 14.0), 23.3 (95%CI 22.8 to 23.9), and 23.5% (95%CI 23.0 to 24.1%) were achieved in 2005, 2009, 2014, 2017, and 2018, respectively. National median door-to-needle times were 60-70 minutes before 2012 and then decreased progressively every year to 25 minutes (IQR 17 to 36) in 2018. In 2018, 33% of both university and non-university hospitals achieved median door-to-needle time ≤20 minutes. In 2018, door-to-needle times ≤20, ≤45, and ≤60 minutes were achieved in 39, 85, and 93% of patients. DISCUSSION: Thrombolysis can be provided to ≥ 20% of all ischemic strokes nationwide and it is realistic to achieve median door-to-needle time 20 minutes. CONCLUSION: Stroke 20-20 could serve as national implementation target for intravenous thrombolysis and country specific implementation policies should be applied to achieve such target.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mikulík et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke. Multicomponent interventions to optimise prehospital and hospital management vs. Historical baseline (2005) was evaluated on Thrombolytic rate. National implementation interventions increased the intravenous thrombolysis rate for ischemic stroke from 1.3% in 2005 to 23.5% in 2018, and reduced median door-to-needle time to 25 minutes.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: