Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To assess the efficacy and safety of oxybutynin transdermal gel 3% (OTG3%), with propylene glycol for enhanced skin permeation, in patients with urinary incontinence (UI). METHODS: In this phase 3 study, 626 patients ≥18 years old with urgency and/or mixed UI symptoms and predominantly urgency UI for ≥3 months were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 12 weeks of OTG3% 84 mg, OTG3% 56 mg, or placebo gel applied once daily to abdomen, inner/upper thigh, or upper arm/shoulder. Primary efficacy endpoint was change from baseline to Week 12 in weekly UI episodes recorded in 3-day bladder diaries. Results were compared using analysis of covariance. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored. RESULTS: Efficacy was assessed in 601 (intent-to-treat) and safety in 626 patients. At 12 weeks, OTG3% 84 mg/day achieved significantly greater improvement versus placebo in weekly UI episodes (mean change from baseline: -20.4 vs. -18.1; P < 0.05(a)), daily urinary frequency (-2.6 vs. -1.9; P = 0.001(b)), and urinary void volume (32.7 vs. 9.8; P < 0.0001(b)). Dry mouth, the most common treatment-related AE, occurred more often with OTG3% 84 mg/day (26/214 [12.1%]) vs. placebo (10/202 [5.0%]) (P = 0.028); 4 OTG3% patients withdrew because of dry mouth. Application site erythema occurred more often with OTG3% 84 mg/day (8/214 [3.7%]) versus placebo (2/202 [1.0%]) (P = NS); 12 OTG patients withdrew because of skin irritation. No serious treatment-related AEs occurred. CONCLUSIONS: OTG3% 84 mg/day was well tolerated and effective in improving urge incontinence or mixed UI symptoms with a predominance of UI in adults with overactive bladder.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Goldfischer et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: