Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CONTEXT: Connectivity is fundamental to understanding how landscape form influences ecological function. However, uncertainties persist due to the difficulty and expense of gathering empirical data to drive or to validate connectivity models, especially in urban areas, where relationships are multifaceted and the habitat matrix cannot be considered to be binary. OBJECTIVES: This research used circuit theory to model urban bird flows (i.e. 'current'), and compared results to observed abundance. The aims were to explore the ability of this approach to predict wildlife flows and to test relationships between modelled connectivity and variation in abundance. METHODS: ), drawing parameters from published studies of woodland bird flows in urban environments. Model performance was then tested against observed abundance data. Weaker correlations were found for other woodland species, suggesting the approach may be expandable if re-parameterised. CONCLUSIONS: Trees provide suitable habitat for urban woodland bird species, but their location in large, contiguous patches and corridors along barriers also facilitates connectivity networks throughout the urban matrix. Urban connectivity studies are well-served by the advantages of circuit theory approaches, and benefit from the empirical study of wildlife flows in these landscapes to parameterise this type of modelling more explicitly. Such results can prove informative and beneficial in designing urban green space and new developments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grafius et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: